Much has been made of how surge in illegal immigration into cities as far from the border as Chicago and New York threaten the fiscal resilience of the receiving cities (Mayor Adams says the migrant crisis will "destroy New York City"), and the impact on resilience doesn't end there.
A better system, in accordance with the concept of "self-control," would honor our immigration tradition and preserve Americans' - all Americans' - abilities to reach those serene places our nation has been blessed with.
The latest data on "ghost job ads," unemployment, and catch-and-release show how easily replaceable some workers are in this market.
The Democratic Party platform proclaims promises to "protect wildlife habitats and biodiversity...by conserving 30 percent of our lands and waters by 2030." But anyone familiar with NumbersUSA's sprawl studies understands that promise is undercut by immigration-driven population growth.
Four out of five Americans say the area where they live either has enough people living there, or is already too crowded. The U.S. Census Bureau predicts that America's population will grow by another 70 million in the next 40 years, with immigration accounting for roughly 90%.
New data shows illegal immigration is outpacing legal even more than previously thought.
Time and again, we see examples of citizens being asked to sacrifice and conserve in order to accommodate a federal immigration system that is unsustainable by any definition.
Proposals to accommodate the worst border crisis America has ever witnessed belong in the realm of science fiction, in a world where limits don't exist. In reality, the lesson of limits is all around us.
Record border deaths, child labor exploitation, and strain on American communities - A better immigration system starts with employers following the law.
Habitat loss, despite mitigation efforts, is an inevitable result of adding more than 3 million people per year.