Salmon Letter:
Salmon Letter
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportSalmon Letter
H.R. 3979:
Carl Levin and Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
No PositionTo amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that emergency services volunteers are not taken into account as employees under the shared responsibility requirements contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
H.R. 3979:
Carl Levin and Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
No PositionTo amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that emergency services volunteers are not taken into account as employees under the shared responsibility requirements contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
H.R. 3921:
IN STATE Act of 2014
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 3921, the IN-STATE for Dreamers Act, would provide $750 million in grants over a 10-year period for States that provide in-State tuition and financial assistance to “Dreamer students.” Though the fundamental requirements are that the alien student initially entered prior to age 16 and can provide a list of secondary schools attended in the U.S., those two requirements shall be waived for those who demonstrate compelling circumstances for an inability to comply.
S. 1943:
IN-STATE for Dreamers Act of 2014
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeS. 1943, the IN-STATE for Dreamers Act, would provide $750 million in grants over a 10-year period for States that provide in-State tuition and financial assistance to “Dreamer students.” Though the fundamental requirements are that the alien student initially entered prior to age 16 and can provide a list of secondary schools attended in the U.S., those two requirements shall be waived for those who demonstrate compelling circumstances for an inability to comply.
H.R. 3857:
Enforce the Take Care Clause Act of 2014
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 3857, the Enforce the Take Care Clause Act, would allow Congress to sue the Administration over a failure to enforce the law, or for other violations of the Constitution. This could increase interior enforcement of immigration laws if, for example, Congress were able to successful sue the Obama Administration for its DACA Executive Amnesty or for its failure to implement the entry-exit system.
H.R. 3611:
DHS Immigration Accountability and Transparency Act of 2013
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 3611, the DHS Immigration Accountability and Transparency Act of 2013, would require the Secretary of DHS to submit a detailed annual report on immigration policy directives, covering matters ranging from previous removal statistics and the estimated number of aliens present without lawful status to the number of immigration cases closed due to immigration policy directives. In response to recent reports that the Administration is “cooking the books” on its removal numbers, detailed information is required regarding the methods by which the statistics were compiled.
H.R. 15:
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 15, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, was a massive immigration reform bill, introduced by Rep. Joe Garcia (D-Fla.) and was the House companion to the Gang of 8's S. 744. H.R. 15 would result in approximately 30 million new permanent work permits issued in the first 10 years if passed. The bill would grant legal status and worker permits to an estimated 11 million illegal aliens with an opportunity for green cards after 10 years and replace some family-based immigration categories with a merit-based points system.
H.R. 3163:
CIR ASAP Act of 2013
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeTo provide for comprehensive immigration reform, and for other purposes.
H.R. 3141:
Biometric Exit Improvement Act of 2013
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 3141, the Biometric Exit Improvement Act of 2013 would weaken border control by exempting non-pedestrian traffic from the entry-exit system. This would exempt an estimated 25% of all border crossings from the entry-exit system and create a loophole for would-be illegal aliens who would not be subject to the exit system and, thus, could potentially overstay in the U.S.