DHS funding (including FEMA and TSA as well as ICE and CBP) is at risk of running out this week as Congress debates ICE reforms. Some of the demands are legitimate calls for immigration agents to operate with a high level of professionalism and safety. Other demands would effectively halt enforcement in a variety of different scenarios. We have to recognize the difference.
Democratic Leaders Sen. Schumer and Rep. Jeffries released their 10 demands last week. While Leader Thune said the demands were “unrealistic and unserious,” several would prevent immigration enforcement outright, including:
They say the devil is in the details, but these broad strokes are bad enough.
Here’s why that matters:
These authorities enable enforcement in real time.
Requiring a judicial warrant for every arrest would grind immigration enforcement to a halt and clog our courts.
For a deeper dive, see Andrew R. Arthur’s analysis.
Ruy Teixeira rounds up the the key polling amidst the DHS funding debate:
The most effective way to reduce the number of illegal immigrants is to encourage them to return home on their own. Congress and the Trump Administration could use tools like E-Verify to increase self deportations. There will be people who refuse to go, however, and ICE is the agency tasked by Congress for enforcing immigration laws in the interior of the United States. The polling is clear: Americans want ICE to do its job effectively and professionally.
Some of the demands we’re seeing would simply prevent ICE from doing its job.