Home > Hot Topics > Comprehensive Amnesty Threat > DREAM Act > DREAM Act Proposes More than Amnesty

DREAM Act

Overview

In-State Tuition for Future Illegal Aliens

In-State Tuition for Future Illegal Aliens

  • The bills retroactively repeal the federal ban on in-state tuition for illegal aliens, thus nullifying the lawsuits already decided in favor of the federal ban, but currently under appeal.
The Amnesty
  • To qualify for lawful permanent resident status, an applicant must be inadmissible or deportable and must:
    • Have been physically present in the US for the five years preceding the date of enactment (the bill does not specify how aliens are to prove this, or even whether they have to prove it);
    • Have been under the age of 16 upon entry into the US;
    • Be a “person of good moral character,” but only AFTER the application is filed;
    • Not have been convicted of an aggravated felony or more than two misdemeanors (though being charged with such crimes is fine);
    • Not be a known terrorist or national security risk;
    • Not be a known/convicted smuggler or human trafficker (all other immigration violations are fine, and this one can be waived for humanitarian or family unity purposes);
    • Not have abducted a child and taken the child to a different country (in the Senate bill only); and
    • At the time of filing an application, have been admitted to an institution of higher education, or have a high school diploma or a GED.
The House and Senate versions of the DREAM Act are almost identical, with four important exceptions:
  • H.R. 1751 would allow illegal aliens of any age over five (since they have to have been present in the United States for five years) to apply for amnesty, while S. 729 requires applicants to be under the age of 35.
  • H.R. 1751 does not disqualify from amnesty international child abductors or aliens who have received final orders of removal or exclusion, while S. 729 does.
  • H.R. 1751 limits the availability of waivers of the requirements for amnesty to cases of “extreme hardship,” while S. 729 makes waivers available for humanitarian and family unity purposes, as well as for the “public interest.”
  • S. 729 authorizes fines and up to five years in prison for “willfully and knowingly” falsifying or lying on an amnesty application; H.R. 1751 includes no such penalties.
The Senate version also requires that applicants:
  • Have never received a final order of removal or exclusion unless the alien successfully played the legal system and found a way to remain in the US under color of law, or the final order was issued before the alien turned 16; and
  • Be under 35 years of age as of the date of enactment.
  • Neither bill includes a requirement that an amnesty applicant produce either documentation or any other evidence that the individual actually satisfies the criteria listed above.
  • There are no numerical limits on how many illegal aliens may be granted amnesty, and they cannot be counted against any existing immigration cap.
  • There is no end date on the application period, so there is nothing to stop illegal aliens who enter the country in the future from applying if they are willing to lie about when they entered.
  • No alien who files an amnesty application may be removed from the United States before the application is adjudicated completely. There are no exceptions to this, so as long as an alien files an amnesty application before he flies a plane into the World Trade Center or goes on a killing spree in the local mall, he cannot be removed from the country until USCIS (hopefully) denies his application and he has exhausted all appeals.
“Conditional” Permanent Residence
  • Aliens granted amnesty would be given conditional permanent resident status for six years. This conditional status could only be terminated if DHS determines that the alien:
    • Is no longer a person of good moral character;
    • Has been convicted of an aggravated felony or three or more misdemeanors;
    • Is a terrorist, human smuggler, or (in the Senate version) international child abductor;
    • Has become a public charge (there are no regulations defining this term in immigration law, so this provision is not currently enforceable); or
    • Received a dishonorable or other than honorable discharge from the military.
    • Should an alien’s conditional status be terminated, the alien would return to whatever immigration status he or she had prior to getting amnesty. This means the alien would have to be put through removal proceedings and exhaust all available appeals before being removed, even though the alien admitted to being inadmissible or deportable in the application for amnesty.
The Path to Citizenship
  • When the amnestied aliens complete their six years of conditional permanent resident status, they can petition USCIS to have the conditions removed and become regular lawful permanent residents. The petition may be filed any time within the six months leading up to, or the two years following, the end of the six-year period. Each amnestied alien must indicate in the petition that he or she:
    • Has demonstrated good moral character since filing for amnesty;
    • Has not been convicted of disqualifying crimes;
    • Is not a terrorist, human smuggler, or (in the Senate version) international child abductor;
    • Has not been absent from the US for more than 365 days during the six years (or he/she can explain such absence and why it doesn’t indicate abandonment of US residence); and
    • Has completed at least ONE of the following:
      • A degree from a US institution of higher education or at least two years toward such a degree; or
      • At least two years of military service and, if discharged, was honorably discharged.
      • For those aliens who have not completed two years of college or service in the military during this six-year period, DHS may waive this requirement and remove their conditional status if the alien:
      • Satisfies the other requirements;
      • Demonstrates “compelling circumstances for the inability to meet the last requirement; and
      • Demonstrates that his/her removal would result in “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to the alien or the alien’s spouse, parent, or child who is a citizen or lawful permanent resident.
      • Alternatively, upon “a showing of good cause,” DHS may extend the six-year period of conditional status to give the alien more time to complete one of these requirements.
      • While amnestied aliens must successfully petition to have their conditional status removed before they may naturalize, their six years of conditional residence counts toward the naturalization requirement. Thus, these aliens will be able to apply for naturalization immediately upon the removal of conditional status.
      • Since conditional permanent resident status can only be terminated for one of the reasons in the section above, and since neither bill includes either a requirement that amnestied aliens petition to have their conditional status removed or a provision that terminates the legal status of aliens who do not seek to have the conditions removed, there is nothing to prevent an alien from simply remaining in conditional status permanently. This would be especially helpful to aliens who would not meet the criteria for removal of the conditions. The only major benefit they would be denied would be the opportunity to naturalize.
Handling the Additional Workload
  • USCIS would bear the brunt of the massive amnesty workload this bill would generate. The bill’s authors undoubtedly are aware that USCIS announced a few years ago its successful completion of the Backlog Elimination Program, which was instituted before DHS was even created, to address the rapidly growing backlog of immigration benefits applications processed by USCIS. USCIS reported that the backlog had reached a high of almost four million applications by January, 2004. Then-USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez announced on September 5, 2006, that the backlog had been reduced to 140,000. (Of course, most of that reduction was achieved by redefining the word “backlog,” and the rest was the result of shortcuts on security checks.) The bill’s authors also are undoubtedly aware of the fact that USCIS recently raised immigration fees by unprecedented amounts so that it would have the resources to stay current on applications. Perhaps the bill’s authors are even aware of the fact that USCIS reports that it had 3.2 million applications pending as of January, 2009, despite the alleged success of the Backlog Elimination Program and the fee hikes.
  • This could explain why the bill gives exclusive jurisdiction to DHS (meaning USCIS) to grant or deny amnesty applications, except where an alien is put in removal proceedings either before or after filing an amnesty application. In these cases, the Attorney General would have exclusive jurisdiction. While this likely would result in lawsuits alleging disparate treatment of applications by the two agencies, at least is will spread the workload around a bit, assuming there are still some enforcement efforts that result in illegal aliens being placed in removal proceedings.
  • The Attorney General also would be required to stay removal proceedings for all illegal aliens who appear to meet the requirements for amnesty, are at least 12 years old, and are enrolled full time in school.
Americans Need Not Apply
  • The good news for illegal alien students is that if their removal proceedings are stayed, they are automatically authorized to work in the US, regardless of whether they apply for and are granted amnesty. This is in addition to all the illegal aliens who are actually granted amnesty and automatically given work authorization with their conditional permanent resident status.
Law Enforcement Provisions
  • Under the Senate bill, “willfully and knowingly” lying on an amnesty application is punishable by a fine, up to five years in prison, or both.
  • None of the information provided by illegal aliens in their applications may be used for any purpose except the adjudication of the application, with two exceptions:
    • The AG or DHS must provide such information if a law enforcement agency is investigating or prosecuting a criminal or terrorism-related offense that would make an alien inadmissible, and such agency requests the information in writing; and
    • Coroners attempting to identify the dead are the only others granted access to the information.
Moving to the Front of the Line
  • Both bills require USCIS to adjudicate all amnesty applications on “an expedited basis” but prohibit the agency from requiring a higher fee from amnesty applicants for such expedited processing. This means that every illegal alien who applies for amnesty would move to the front of the line, ahead of the millions of people who are in line to come to the United States the right way.
Bonus Reward for Illegal Students
  • Amnesty beneficiaries would be eligible for certain student loans and federal work-study programs.
Assessing the Damage
  • Within seven years after enactment, the GAO would be required to submit to Congress a report on the number of aliens amnestied, the breakdown of approvals versus denials, and the number whose conditional status had been removed.
Download this page as a PDF or download our one-page handout on the DREAM Act.

Show More

Visit your Action Buffet to take action!

Update

DREAM Act Proposes More than Amnesty

Sen. Dick Durbin

Sen. Dick Durbin

Congressmen Who...

  • Sponsored the DREAM Act
    Updated Monday, December 14, 2009, 2:40 PM EST
Sponsors of the DREAM Act
Sponsors of Senate Version (S.729)
Sponsors of House Version (H.R.1751)
Count: 31
Count: 107
  • (CA) Boxer
  • (CA) Feinstein
  • (CA) Honda
  • (CO) Bennet
  • (CO) Udall
  • (CT) Dodd
  • (CT) Lieberman
  • (DE) Kaufman
  • (FL) Nelson
  • (HI) Inouye
  • (IL) Burris
  • (IL) Durbin
  • (IL) Jackson
  • (IN) Lugar
  • (IA) Harkin
  • (MD) Cardin
  • (MD) Mikulski
  • (MA) Kennedy
  • (MA) Kerry
  • (MI) Levin
  • (MN) Franken
  • (NV) Reid
  • (NJ) Menendez
  • (NM) Bingaman
  • (NY) Gillibrand
  • (NY) Schumer
  • (PA) Specter
  • (RI) Whitehouse
  • (VT) Leahy
  • (VT) Sanders
  • (WA) Cantwell
  • (WA) Murray
  • (WI) Feingold
  • (AZ) Grijalva
  • (AZ) Pastor
  • (AR) Snyder
  • (CA) Becerra
  • (CA) Berman
  • (CA) Capps
  • (CA) Chu
  • (CA) S.Davis
  • (CA) Eshoo
  • (CA) Farr
  • (CA) Filner
  • (CA) Harman
  • (CA) Lee
  • (CA) Lofgren
  • (CA) Miller
  • (CA) Napolitano
  • (CA) Nunes
  • (CA) Roybal-Allard
  • (CA) Sanchez
  • (CA) Schiff
  • (CA) Stark
  • (CA) Waters
  • (CA) Watson
  • (CA) Waxman
  • (CA) Woosley
  • (CO) DeGette
  • (CO) Polis
  • (CT) DeLauro
  • (FL) Brown
  • (FL) Castor
  • (FL) L.Diaz-Balart
  • (FL) M.Diaz-Balart
  • (FL) Hastings
  • (FL) Meek
  • (FL) Ros-Lehtinen
  • (FL) Wasserman Shultz
  • (HI) Abercrombie
  • (IL) Davis
  • (IL) Gutierrez
  • (IL) Jackson
  • (IL) Quigly
  • (IL) Rush
  • (IL) Schakowsky
  • (IN) Carson
  • (LA) Cao
  • (MD) Cummings
  • (MD) Sarbanes
  • (MA) Capuano
  • (MA) Delahunt
  • (MA) Frank
  • (MA) Lynch
  • (MA) Markey
  • (MA)McGovern
  • (MA) Neal
  • (MA) Oliver
  • (MA) Tierney
  • (MA) Tsongas
  • (MI) Conyers
  • (MI) Kilpatrick
  • (MN) Ellison
  • (MO) Clay
  • (MO) Cleaver
  • (NV) Berkley
  • (NJ) Holt
  • (NJ) Rothman
  • (NM) Heinrich
  • (NY) Ackerman
  • (NY) Clarke
  • (NY) Crowley
  • (NY) Engel
  • (NY) Israel
  • (NY) Lowey
  • (NY) Maffei
  • (NY) Maloney
  • (NY) Meeks
  • (NY) McCarthy
  • (NY) Nadler
  • (NY) Rangel
  • (NY) Serrano
  • (NY) Tonko
  • (NY) Towns
  • (NY) Weiner
  • (NC) Price
  • (NC) Watt
  • (OR) Blumenauer
  • (OR) Wu
  • (PA) Fattah
  • (PA) Sestak
  • (RI) Kennedy
  • (RI) Langevin
  • (TN) Cohen
  • (TX) Doggett
  • (TX) Gonzalez
  • (TX) Green
  • (TX) Hinojosa
  • (TX) Jackson-Lee
  • (TX) E.Johnson
  • (TX) Ortiz
  • (TX) Reyes
  • (TX) Rodriguez
  • (VA) Moran
  • (WA) McDermott
  • (WA) Larsen
  • (WA) Smith
  • (WI) Baldwin
  • (WI) Moore
Main bill sponsors in BOLD

S.729/H.R.1751

Supporters of Sen. Durbin's DREAM Act will say that the purpose of the bill is to ensure that the children of illegal aliens--who were brought here through no fault of their own and shouldn't be penalized for the sins of their parents--have an opportunity to go to college. What they won't tell you is that it would provide amnesty to any illegal alien under the age of 35 who first entered the United States before the age of 16, has been in the country for at least the last five years, and has earned a high school diploma or GED in the United States.

But here's the kicker: Illegal aliens only have to submit a petition in which they claim to meet these requirements. There is not a single provision in the DREAM Act that requires the aliens to provide proof that the claims are true. In fact, once an illegal alien submits this required petition, the only way the alien can be denied amnesty is if DHS proves that the claims are false. The potential for fraud is virtually unlimited.

The incentives created by the bill make massive fraud a certainty. For example, once an illegal alien files a petition for amnesty, regardless of whether the alien actually meets the requirements or not, DHS is prohibited from deporting that individual for any reason until the petition is granted or until DHS has found proof that the alien does not qualify and so denies the petition. There are no exceptions to this. So, as long as an illegal alien files an amnesty petition before he flies a plane into the World Trade Center or goes on a killing spree in a local mall, we are stuck with him for as long as it takes an already backlogged agency to consider his application for amnesty. Rest assured, though, that no illegal alien with a criminal record--unless it only involves one or two misdemeanor convictions like DUIs or domestic violence, or it only involves violations of immigration laws--or who is a terrorist--at least not ones we actually know are terrorists because they are listed on the terrorist watch list and they use their real names to apply--can qualify for amnesty.

Of course, the bill requires DHS to move all amnesty petitions to the front of the line--ahead of the millions of people who have been waiting for years to come to the United States legally--so it shouldn't take more than six months or so to decide any one application--unless amnesty is denied, in which case the illegal alien could extend the process for several years by appealing the denial.

The DREAM Act sets no numerical limits on how many illegal aliens may be granted amnesty, and they cannot be counted against the current annual Green Card limits. Furthermore, once granted permanent resident status, beneficiaries of the DREAM amnesty can then sponsor their relatives for legal immigration to the United States under current chain migration laws. So all in all, this little bill to ensure that children can get a good education would quickly begin to rival the "one-time-only" amnesty of 1986, under which some three million illegal aliens and their spouses and children were given green cards, along with countless extended relatives.

Finally, just in case future illegal aliens--who would continue entering the United States in even larger numbers since amnesty always causes more illegal immigration and this bill does absolutely nothing to deter it--feel left out, the DREAM Act would retroactively repeal the federal law that prohibits state colleges and universities from giving illegal aliens in-state tuition rates. The repeal would have two results: First, it would mean that each state would be free to decide whether to give in-state tuition to illegal aliens instead of U.S. citizens and legal residents (after all, there are a set number of in-state tuition slots, so giving one to an illegal alien means one less for a citizen or legal resident); and second, it would nullify the various lawsuits that have been filed challenging those states that already have violated federal law by giving illegal aliens in-state tuition, so those states would get away with breaking the law with impunity. Now, there's a lesson we all want our children to learn, right?

For NumbersUSA's full analysis of the DREAM Act, see our Fact Sheet.

You can also visit the Proposed Bills page and look under Amnesty for updates on the DREAM Act.

For most of you, there are faxes on your Action Buffet to send to your Representatives urging them not to support the DREAM Act.

Publications

FACT SHEET: DREAM Act (1 page)

Fact Sheets - Tuesday, April 14, 2009

The DREAM Act has been reintroduced in both the House (H.R. 1751, by Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA)) and the Senate (S. 729, by Sen. Dick Durban (D-IL). Several cosponsors of the legislation have referred to the DREAM Act as a “narrow” proposal to deal only with the children brought here illegally by their illegal-alien parents.

By Rosemary Jenks

Download Publication

Fact Sheet: 2009 Dream Act

Fact Sheets - Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Sponsored by Senator Dick Durbin, the 2009 Dream Act would amnesty certain illegal aliens under the pretense of providing educational opportunities for children.

Download Publication

Polls

Rasmussen Poll Shows 66% of Likely Voters Believe it is Important to Reduce Illegal Immigration

Oppose Amnesty Support Tougher Enforcement Oppose Rewards for Illegal Migration Opinion Elites vs. Public - Tuesday, April 14, 2009

A new Rasmussen poll shows that 66% of likely voters believe that the government should improve border enforcement and reduce illegal immigration.  However, only 32% of America's "Political Class" agree.

The poll also shows that 77% of likely voters believe that illegal aliens should not be able to receive driver's licenses and 73% of Americans believe that police officers should automatically check to see if someone is in this country legally when that person is pulled over for a traffic violation. 

Rasmussen Reports, 14 April 2009

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics2/on_immigration_large_gap_remains_between_mainstream_america_and_political_class

Gannett Poll Finds NJ Residents Oppose Rewards for Illegal Aliens

Oppose Rewards for Illegal Migration - Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Sixty-two percent of state residents oppose granting illegal immigrants some type of limited driver's license, according to a Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey poll.

Only 32 percent said children of illegal immigrants deserved in-state tuition rates, while 20 percent favored the lower rates for illegal immigrants themselves.

http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20090324/NEWS01/903240343/1006/

Immigration Ranks 10th in Priorities

Support Tougher Enforcement - Monday, January 19, 2009

In a Washington Post/ABC Poll released just before Barack Obama's inaguration, respondents ranked immigration No. 10 on a list of priorities for the administration. The economy, Iraq War, foreign policy and education were all ranked ahead of immigration. Twenty-one percent said that it was the highest priority, 48 percent said it was high priority, while 29 percent said it was low priority.

Washington Post/ABC Poll - January 19

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/postpoll_011709.html

Transatlantic Trends: Immigration

Protect Jobs and Wages Support Tougher Enforcement - Tuesday, November 18, 2008

When asked about what governments should do to address illegal immigration, 83% of respondents supported stronger border controls, 74% supported cracking down on employers, and 68% supported deportation.

The German Marshall Fund of the United States, 2008

Download Publication

No Post-election Mandate for Amnesty

Oppose Amnesty - Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Only 32% of Obama voters considered his support for amnesty as a factor in their decisions to vote for him. 67% said it was either not a factor at all, or they voted for Obama in spite of his stance on amnesty.

60% of voters said reducing illegal immigration and cracking down on employers who hire them is important to them, while only 21% supported "legalizing or creating a pathway to citizenship" for illegal aliens.

57% of voters stated that amnesty would harm American workers and further strain public resources, while only 26% believe amnesty would aid economic recovery and ease public burdens.

http://www.fairus.org/site/DocServer/zogby_2008_tabresults.pdf.pdf?docID=2262

Rasmussen Poll reveals Americans Angry over Immigration

Oppose Amnesty Support Tougher Enforcement - Friday, November 7, 2008

Twenty-six of respondents are angry over immigration policy in the United States.

Sixty-two percent say gaining control of the borders is more important than legalizing the status of undocumented workers.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/26_angry_about_immigration_the_issue_candidates_ignore

In the News

Undocumented students pin hopes on U.S. education bill

Quoted - Sunday, June 21, 2009

Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, said his group, which advocates reducing immigration, would vigorously oppose the bill. "This act basically creates the path for their parents to become citizens," said Beck. "They're using the kids as a battering ram to get a full scale amnesty bill through."

Most students say they keep their status to themselves, sharing it with teachers only when they must. Jaime Martinez, a guidance counselor at Westbury High School, said he learns of the cases as college application time approaches. "Of course they feel frustration," he said. Graduating from college is the first obstacle, he said. "What is there for them to do after that?"

By Sumathi Reddy -- New York Newsday

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/nassau/ny-lidrea2212864744jun21,0,4559982.story

Immigrants' children might get help from DREAM Act

NumbersUSA In the News - Monday, May 18, 2009

"Their parents have put them in a very difficult situation," said Roy Beck, director of Numbers USA, a Washington, D.C. group that advocates for reduced immigration levels. "We can't just keep having one amnesty after another without fixing the fundamental problem...We have magnets that invite people to become illegal aliens because we make it so easy for them to hold jobs."

By Víctor Manuel Ramos -- Orlando Sentinel

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/orl-young-immigrants-dream-act-051809,0,3373504.story

Sen. Jeff Sessions will replace Arlen Specter on judiciary committee

Quoted - Tuesday, May 5, 2009

He's a major proponent of E-Verify, the voluntary government program that allows employers to certify whether prospective workers are legally authorized to work in the United States. During the debate over the federal stimulus bill in February, Sessions led a failed bid to add amendments that would have forced federal contractors receiving stimulus funds to use the E-Verify program.

"Now we have the No. 1 champion for the American workers on immigration issues being the ranking member," said Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, an immigration-reduction advocacy group.

By James Oliphant -- Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-court-sessions5-2009may05,0,3065504.story

Some Christians Applaud Obama's Push for Immigration Reform

In the News Quoted - Tuesday, April 14, 2009

"Some Christian leaders and organizations voiced support for President Obama's indication that he plans to address immigration reform this year, a move that has riled opponents who argue that he should first focus on fixing the economy.

"Christians throughout the United States are energized and encouraged by the courageous steps taken by the Obama administration to prioritize reform of our broken immigration laws," praised Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CCIR) in a statement released on Thursday....

"It just doesn't seem rational that any political leader would say, let's give millions of foreign workers permanent access to U.S. jobs when we have millions of Americans looking for jobs," said Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, a group that supports reduced immigration, to the New York Times.

Ethan Cole, Christian Post, 10 April 2009

"Some Christian leaders and organizations voiced support for President Obama's indication that he plans to address immigration reform this year, a move that has riled opponents who argue that he should first focus on fixing the economy.

"Christians throughout the United States are energized and encouraged by the courageous steps taken by the Obama administration to prioritize reform of our broken immigration laws," praised Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CCIR) in a statement released on Thursday....

"It just doesn't seem rational that any political leader would say, let's give millions of foreign workers permanent access to U.S. jobs when we have millions of Americans looking for jobs," said Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, a group that supports reduced immigration, to the New York Times.

"It's going to be, ‘You're letting them keep that job, when I could have that job,'" he said."

Ethan Cole, Christian Post, 10 April 2009

Show More http://www.christianpost.com/Society/Politics/2009/04/-some-christians-applaud-obama-s-push-for-immigration-reform-10/

As unemployment climbs, groups push for immigration reduction

Quoted - Sunday, March 8, 2009

Roy Beck, president and CEO of NumbersUSA Education Research Foundation, an immigration-reduction nonprofit organization, advocates a bill to temporarily stop most foreign workers from entering the U.S. until the economy improves and Congress can approve new immigration legislation.

The country could continue to allow refugees, spouses and minor children of green card holders to come in, Beck said, but only about 5,000 highly skilled laborers who are of "critical, national interest" should come to work.

"Congress needs to do the same thing it did with the stimulus package," Beck said. "It doesn't need to figure everything out long-term."

By Kaylyn Belsha -- Medill News Service

http://nwi.com/articles/2009/03/08/news/illinois/doc32a0dd716ae13cd18625757200825758.txt

Obama faces pressure on immigration reform

Quoted - Monday, November 17, 2008

Many analysts are skeptical that Oba ma can navigate the political minefield of illegal immigration in his first year, while confronting the plunging economy and two wars. Still, groups on both sides are commissioning polls to gauge Americans' appetite for the immigration issue and assembling teams to file legislation for their cause next year.

"We're going to be fighting like crazy to keep it off the floor" in Congress, said Roy Beck, president of NumbersUSA, the nation's largest group favoring immigration controls. "Now is not the time to be talking about this."

By Maria Sacchetti, Globe Staff

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/11/17/obama_faces_pressure_on_immigration_reform/

Immigration Cools as Campaign Issue

Quoted - Thursday, October 30, 2008

“We’re going to have an incredibly bad White House, so we’re in for some tough defensive battles,” said Roy Beck, president of NumbersUSA, which favors reduced immigration. “We have to make sure we’ve got at least 41 senators so we can block any Obama or McCain amnesty.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/29/us/politics/29immig.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin

One News Now talks with Roy Beck

Quoted - Tuesday, October 28, 2008

"We are going to have to mobilize, as grassroots people...against the establishment if we're going to save this country, because believe me, we are talking about saving the country," NumbersUSA's Roy Beck said.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=297960

Sen. Nelson rallies against student's deportation

In the News - Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Sen. Bill Nelson has called for authorities to halt the deportation of a Miami man whose immigration story has inspired protests and riled up immigration activists throughout South Florida.

In a letter last week addressed to a top federal immigration official, Nelson praised Walter Lara, a 23-year-old who is to be deported July 6. He called him ''exactly the type of person'' a new immigration bill is ''trying to help.'' Lara's story ''vividly illustrates'' the need for Congress to pass the DREAM Act, Nelson, a Democrat, said.

The bill would grant certain immigrants who graduate from U.S. high schools conditional permanent residency.

By Brittany Levine -- The Miami Herald

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/miami-dade/story/1118685.html

78% in poll say no to illegal immigrant students act

In the News - Friday, June 19, 2009

Readers overwhelmingly oppose a bill that would provide students who are in the country illegally a pathway to residency among other rights that are now granted to resident students.

More than 75 percent of readers responding said no to the following question: "Do you think college students who are in the country illegally should be given a path to residency, protected from deportation and eligible for student loans and federal work study programs?, according to an Orange County Register poll.

By Cindy Carcamo -- The Orange County (Cali.) Register

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/readers-act-students-2469108-college-most

Harvard's Faust backs path to legal residency

In the News - Thursday, May 21, 2009

Harvard President Drew Gilpin Faust yesterday backed federal legislation that would clear the way for illegal immigrant students to apply for legal residency, an endorsement that stunned students and drew criticism for a president who has largely steered clear of fierce debates.

In a letter this week to federal lawmakers, Faust expressed "strong support" for legislation known as the Dream Act, which would allow students who have been in this country since they were 15 to apply for legal residency under certain conditions. She acknowledged that students with "immigration status issues" attend Harvard, and said the bill would be a "lifeline" to such students.

By Maria Sacchetti, Boston Globe

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/05/21/harvards_faust_backs_path_to_legal_residency?mode=PF

Sheriffs: Are you in school legally?

In the News - Tuesday, April 28, 2009

"Some border county sheriffs want Arizona schools to start asking students whether they're in this country legally.

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik originated the idea and said millions of dollars in Arizona taxes go to teach English to children who have no legal right to be here. He also said there's a link involving illegal immigration, social problems and gangs.

Only thing is, a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision appears to make it illegal for school officials to ask. In a 5-4 decision, the justices overturned a Texas law that authorized school districts to refuse to enroll anyone who couldn't prove legal residence.""

Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services, 28 April 2009

http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/290558

SHRM-Backed Bill Launches Employment Verification Debate

In the News - Thursday, April 23, 2009

"With momentum building for Congress to address comprehensive immigration reform later this year, two members of the House have introduced a bill to put employment verification at the center of the debate.

Written by Reps. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Arizona, and Sam Johnson, R-Texas, the measure would establish a mandatory electronic verification system that replaces an existing government-run system that has been roundly criticized by employer groups...."

Mark Schoeff, Workforce Management, 23 April 2009

http://www.workforce.com/section/00/article/26/37/71.php

Obama Discusses Immigration with Central American Presidents

In the News - Sunday, April 19, 2009

"U.S. President Barack Obama on Sunday displayed great receptivity to the proposals of his Central American counterparts on the question of immigration reform, several of the leaders said after their meeting....

“There was commitment to support comprehensive immigration reform. Details were not discussed, but supporting the process was. The atmosphere was very good, cordial, sincere,” Colom said.

He and his colleagues from El Salvador, Tony Saca, and Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, emphasized that Obama had been especially receptive to one of the major concerns of Central American countries: the matter of deportations.

Latin American Herald Tribune (Caracas, Venezuela), 19 April 2009

"U.S. President Barack Obama on Sunday displayed great receptivity to the proposals of his Central American counterparts on the question of immigration reform, several of the leaders said after their meeting....

“There was commitment to support comprehensive immigration reform. Details were not discussed, but supporting the process was. The atmosphere was very good, cordial, sincere,” Colom said.

He and his colleagues from El Salvador, Tony Saca, and Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, emphasized that Obama had been especially receptive to one of the major concerns of Central American countries: the matter of deportations.

On the immigration issue, which completely dominated the meeting, the leaders also discussed matters like the possibilities for ensuring family reunification, quotas for agricultural jobs and the fight against drug trafficking, all within a friendly atmosphere amid which the leaders agreed in general terms on almost everything they talked about."

Latin American Herald Tribune (Caracas, Venezuela), 19 April 2009

Show More http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=332234&CategoryId=23558

Schwarzenegger says illegal immigrants aren't to blame for fiscal crisis

In the News - Thursday, April 16, 2009

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Wednesday that the claim by some conservative activists that illegal immigration is to blame for all of the state's fiscal problems is ignorant and bigoted.

The governor made his comments during a public forum at The Times building in downtown Los Angeles, where he expressed frustration with anti-tax organizations and others seeking to derail a package of ballot measures that will come before voters in a May 19 special election. Schwarzenegger and lawmakers placed the measures on the ballot as part of the budget agreement they reached in February.

By Evan Halper -- Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-governor16-2009apr16,0,2484639.story

Illegal Immigrants' Legal Kids Snarl Policy

In the News - Wednesday, April 15, 2009

A new report providing the most detailed portrait to date of the illegal immigrant population found that it is mostly made up of young families that are having children at a much faster rate than previously known. The study, released yesterday by the nonpartisan, Washington-based Pew Hispanic Center, also found that a disproportionate share of such children live in poverty and lack health insurance.

Because any child born in the United States has a right to citizenship, the growing presence of these children is likely to complicate the debate over immigration policies aimed at their parents.

By N.C. Aizenman -- Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/14/AR2009041401433.html?nav=hcmodule

Advocates: Immigration enforcement pushing families onto welfare

In the News - Tuesday, April 14, 2009

The exact number of families affected is hard to determine. Only legal residents and U.S. citizens are eligible for help, but people don't list deportation as a factor when they seek aid. Researchers and advocates, however, say pushing families onto government assistance is a growing side-effect of increased immigration enforcement.

By Georgia East -- South Florida Sun Sentinel

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-deport-welfare-b041409,0,6567717,print.story

Some Christians Applaud Obama's Push for Immigration Reform

In the News Quoted - Tuesday, April 14, 2009

"Some Christian leaders and organizations voiced support for President Obama's indication that he plans to address immigration reform this year, a move that has riled opponents who argue that he should first focus on fixing the economy.

"Christians throughout the United States are energized and encouraged by the courageous steps taken by the Obama administration to prioritize reform of our broken immigration laws," praised Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CCIR) in a statement released on Thursday....

"It just doesn't seem rational that any political leader would say, let's give millions of foreign workers permanent access to U.S. jobs when we have millions of Americans looking for jobs," said Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, a group that supports reduced immigration, to the New York Times.

Ethan Cole, Christian Post, 10 April 2009

"Some Christian leaders and organizations voiced support for President Obama's indication that he plans to address immigration reform this year, a move that has riled opponents who argue that he should first focus on fixing the economy.

"Christians throughout the United States are energized and encouraged by the courageous steps taken by the Obama administration to prioritize reform of our broken immigration laws," praised Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CCIR) in a statement released on Thursday....

"It just doesn't seem rational that any political leader would say, let's give millions of foreign workers permanent access to U.S. jobs when we have millions of Americans looking for jobs," said Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, a group that supports reduced immigration, to the New York Times.

"It's going to be, ‘You're letting them keep that job, when I could have that job,'" he said."

Ethan Cole, Christian Post, 10 April 2009

Show More http://www.christianpost.com/Society/Politics/2009/04/-some-christians-applaud-obama-s-push-for-immigration-reform-10/