The Supreme Court declined to hear a case on Monday that would have addressed the expedited removal of individuals who have their claims for asylum denied by an immigration judge. The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last August that non-citizens do not have a Constitutional right to due process if they are denied asylum. The individuals, 28 women and 33 children from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, challenged the ruling to the Supreme Court.
The individuals were all apprehended in Texas shortly after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally. They immediately claimed asylum, saying they they were escaping violence and abuse in their home countries.
An immigration judge denied their asylum claims because they lacked "credible fear" for persecution and ordered their expedited removals. They challenged the immigration judges' rulings, alleging that they were denied due process. The Philadelphia court ruled that they do not have any constitutional rights of review if denied entry into the country.
The 28 women and 33 children were all apprehended in 2015 during the height of the border surge. After being apprehended, they were relocated to Pennsylvania where some were held in custody while others were given supervised release.
For more on this story, see Reuters.
Updated: Thu, May 11th 2017 @ 2:57pm EDT