Home > Hot Topics > Comprehensive Amnesty Threat > The gulf between Barack Obama's immigration stance and Barbara Jordan’s

The gulf between Barack Obama's immigration stance and Barbara Jordan’s


During his November 14 press conference, President Obama said his broad vision of comprehensive immigration reform "is very similar to the outlines of previous efforts at comprehensive immigration reform." This is newsworthy because previous comprehensive immigration reform efforts since 1986 have produced 7 amnesties, none of which reduced illegal immigration. This begs the question: "Is the permanent reduction of illegal immigration a goal of this administration?"

This blog also appeared as an op-ed in the Daily Caller 

The last bi-partisan U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, chaired by the late U.S. Representative and Democratic icon Barbara Jordan was unambiguous about its goal: "Unlawful immigration is unacceptable," Jordan testified, "those who should not be here will be required to leave."

President Obama signaled a different philosophy on November 14th, saying "I do think that there should be a pathway for legal status for those who are living in this country, are not engaged in criminal activity, are here simply to work."

This is a clear departure from Jordan who couldn't have been clearer on this point. "There are people," she testified, "who argue that some illegal aliens contribute to our community because they may work, pay taxes, send their children to our schools, and in all respects except one, obey the law. Let me be clear: that is not enough."

Jordan's stated concerns were about "the impact of immigration on the most disadvantaged within our already resident society--inner city youth, racial and ethnic minorities, and recent immigrants who have not yet adjusted to life in the U.S." At the time, 3-4 million foreign citizens were working illegally in the U.S. Today, 7 million illegal workers hold U.S. jobs while more than 20 million U.S. citizens and legal immigrant workers can't find full-time work. If that isn't the immigration problem that Obama proposes to fix, what is?

Additionally, if Obama believes an exception should be made for illegal aliens who "are simply here to work," does that apply only to those who are here illegally today, or will his exception extend to future waves of illegal workers? If he wants to make this exception for any future alien who violates the terms of her visa or crosses the border illegally, why have limits on immigration at all beyond terrorists, rapists and murderers? If he wants to limit the exception to an 8th (and final?) amnesty, why is he advocating a "continuation" of policies that got us into this mess in the first place? Obama has rejected Jordan's framework without articulating an alternative.

Jordan didn't take a hard line against non-violent illegal immigration because she was hard-hearted. She did so because she understood that the desire for work is precisely what drives illegal immigration. "[I]f we cannot demagnetize our economy for illegal aliens who come here to seek jobs, we cannot control illegal immigration," she testified. "If we cannot control illegal immigration," she continued, "we cannot sustain our national interest in legal immigration. Those who come here illegally, and those who hire them, will destroy the credibility of our immigration policies and their implementation. In the course of that, I fear, they will destroy our commitment to immigration itself."

Obama has never expressed these concerns.

Barbara Jordan and her commission were clear about how to stop illegal immigration and they recommended the system that is known today as "E-Verify" to reach that goal.

President Obama did not mention E-Verify in his press conference. His policy is to audit individual companies, and fine those who hire illegal workers, but to let the illegal workers go and seek jobs somewhere else. That policy, while good in individual cases, failed to reduce overall illegal employment.

I have searched in vain for a mainstream reporter to notice the daylight between Obama's understanding of illegal immigration and Jordan's. Unquestionably, the president rejects the bi-partisan Jordan Commission's strategy to end illegal immigration. The bigger question is whether President Obama also rejects Jordan's goal to end illegal immigration for the sake of disadvantaged Americans.

This blog also appeared as an op-ed in the Daily Caller  

JEREMY BECK is the Director of the Media Standards Project for NumbersUSA

NumbersUSA's blogs are copyrighted and may be republished or reposted only if they are copied in their entirety, including this paragraph, and provide proper credit to NumbersUSA. NumbersUSA bears no responsibility for where our blogs may be republished or reposted.

Views and opinions expressed in blogs on this website are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect official policies of NumbersUSA.