Notice: MemcachePool::get() [memcachepool.get]: Server legacy-redis-master.legacy-prod.svc.cluster.local (tcp 6379, udp 0) failed with: Malformed VALUE header (0) in /var/www/html/sites/all/modules/memcache/dmemcache.inc on line 63
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/sites/all/modules/memcache/dmemcache.inc:63) in /var/www/html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 582
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/sites/all/modules/memcache/dmemcache.inc:63) in /var/www/html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 583
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/sites/all/modules/memcache/dmemcache.inc:63) in /var/www/html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 584
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/sites/all/modules/memcache/dmemcache.inc:63) in /var/www/html/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 585 New Mexico Governor to Push for Driver's License Ban in 2012 Session | NumbersUSA - For Lower Immigration Levels
New Mexico Governor to Push for Driver's License Ban in 2012 Session
Tuesday, January 17, 2012, 11:12 AM EDT - posted on NumbersUSA
Gov. Susana Martinez
In the upcoming 2012 session, the state legislature in New Mexico will revisit the issue to repeal a 2003 bill which allowed illegal immigrants to obtain drivers licenses in the state. New Mexico is one of three states that allows illegal immigrants to obtain driver's licenses. Since 2003, more than 80,000 foreign nationals have been issued driver's licenses.
Governor Susana Martinez is the major force behind the repeal and Rep. Andy Nunez (I-Hatch) will sponsor the bill this year.
Martinez has repeatedly said that allowing the undocumented to be issued driver's licenses has made the state a magnet for foreign criminals who want to get driver's licenses to have U.S. identification. Plus, the governor points to polls that show a large majority of New Mexicans support the repeal.
"It will be indentical to last year's bill," Nunez said in an interview.
The bill from the 2011 session proved to be controversial, contentious and a bitterly-fought issue for the state legislature.
Last year the House passed Nunez's repeal bill, but only after using the rare process of "blasting" the bill out of a committee that had tabled it. Tabling in committee is a frequent method of killing a bill without a floor vote. "Blasting" takes the bill out of the committee and directly on the floor. After two days of grueling debate on the floor, the House voted 42-28 to pass the bill.
When the bill came to the senate, the senators voted to amend it almost beyond recognition. The senate version of the bill would have kept the current licensing system but would have toughened penalties for fraudulently trying to obtain a driver's license. Also, immigrants would have had to renew their licenses every two years.
The House balked, and after some back and forth between the chambers, the bill died.
Nunez predicts that the bill will pass the house in the 2012 session, but once again supporters will have to 'blast' it out of committee. Therefore, all eyes will be on the Senate, where there are re-elections fears, as all Senate seats are up for election this year. The re-election factor will flip voted in the Senate.
Sen. Steve Fischmann (D-Las Cruces), who voted against the repeal last year, said last week that he might support Nunez's bill this time around. Fischmann says many of his constituents overwhelmingly in favor of the repeal.
Support Tougher Enforcement - Monday, March 19, 2012
In a Pulse Opinion Research poll of 500 likely Alabama voters, 75% support HB 56 and 52% say they "strongly support" the law. The poll also found that 54% of Alabama voters want to keep the law on the books and 59% of voters believe it "will free-up jobs for other Alabama workers."
Support Tougher Enforcement - Wednesday, May 12, 2010
A new Pew Research poll reveals that the majority of Americans support most of the provisions offered in Arizona's new immigration enforcement law. Seventy-three percent of Americans believe that individuals should carry proof of legal status, 67% support police being able to detain an individual that can't prove legal status, 62% support police questioning an individual they suspect to be in the country illegally, and 59% support the Arizona law.
Support Tougher Enforcement - Saturday, May 8, 2010
Fifty-five percent (55%) of Colorado voters favor a law like the one just adopted in Arizona that authorizes local police to stop individuals they suspect of being illegal immigrants, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in the state. Thirty-five percent (35%) oppose such a law.
Support Tougher Enforcement - Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Sixty-two percent (62%) of Florida voters favor a law like Arizona’s that authorizes local police to stop and verify the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being an illegal immigrant.
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of voters in the state finds that 31% oppose such a law.
Support Tougher Enforcement - Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Like voters across the nation, most Arizona voters (57%) favor an immigration policy that welcomes all immigrants except “national security threats, criminals and those who would come here to live off our welfare system.” A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Arizona voters finds that just 27% oppose such a welcoming policy.
At the same time, 76% say it is more important to gain control of the border than it is to legalize the status of undocumented workers. Only 19% believe it is more important to legalize the status of undocumented workers already in the country. These views, too, are consistent with national preferences. However, Arizona voters are a bit more focused on border control.
Support Tougher Enforcement - Monday, April 26, 2010
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that 60% of voters nationwide favor an Arizona-style law, while 31% are opposed.
Seventy-seven percent (77%) of Republicans support the law along with 62% of voters not affiliated with either major party. Democratic voters are evenly divided on the measure.
Support Tougher Enforcement - Wednesday, April 21, 2010
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that 70% of likely voters in Arizona approve of the legislation SB1070, while just 23% oppose it.
Opponents of the measure, including major national Hispanic groups, say it will lead to racial profiling, and 53% of voters in the state are concerned that efforts to identify and deport illegal immigrants also will end up violating the civil rights of some U.S. citizens. Forty-six percent (46%) don’t share that concern
Oppose Rewards for Illegal Migration - Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Sixty-two percent of state residents oppose granting illegal immigrants some type of limited driver's license, according to a Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey poll.
Only 32 percent said children of illegal immigrants deserved in-state tuition rates, while 20 percent favored the lower rates for illegal immigrants themselves.
Finally, we turned to NumbersUSA, an Arlington-Va.-based nonprofit group that opposes illegal immigration and advocates for limits on legal immigration, because it tracks what the presidential candidates say about immigration. The group’s president, Roy Beck, told us that Romney has expressed support for enacting "attrition by enforcement" policies on a national level such as requiring that businesses use E-Verify. Beck said Romney has not said specific provisions of SB 1070 should be taken as a model for federal immigration laws.
“Pearce would have retained his seat in a regular election,” said Roy Beck, president of NumbersUSA, adding, “Probably the key factor to keep in mind is that the recall election occurred when only a half-dozen states were having elections. That allowed open-border forces to concentrate most of their money and energy on Pearce’s tiny Arizona district.
There were few competing requests for the money that was used to buy signatures to create the recall election and then run the outside-group advertising.”
Beck also surmised, “If the challenge to Pearce had happened during a regular election year, it is doubtful that nearly as much open-borders money and energy could have been funneled solely to this recall effort,” and said that alone might easily have made the difference in the outcome.
BY LINDA BENTLEY -- Sonoran News
“Pearce would have retained his seat in a regular election,” said Roy Beck, president of NumbersUSA, adding, “Probably the key factor to keep in mind is that the recall election occurred when only a half-dozen states were having elections. That allowed open-border forces to concentrate most of their money and energy on Pearce’s tiny Arizona district.
There were few competing requests for the money that was used to buy signatures to create the recall election and then run the outside-group advertising.”
Beck also surmised, “If the challenge to Pearce had happened during a regular election year, it is doubtful that nearly as much open-borders money and energy could have been funneled solely to this recall effort,” and said that alone might easily have made the difference in the outcome.
He noted the fact that the rules are different in a recall election than in a regular Primary, whereas non-Republicans were allowed to choose between two Republican candidates.
Beck said, if this had been a regular Primary election, “Pearce most likely would have easily defeated Republican Lewis,” adding, “By all news accounts, the assumption is that Pearce easily won the Republican votes in this recall ballot.”
“All of this is to say that it took some very special circumstances to engineer Pearce’s defeat,” said Beck.
Opponents of the new bill, such as NumbersUSA.com, say mandatory E-Verify is good for the state because it pushes illegal immigrants from the workforce, leaving jobs open for Californians who are legal residents or U.S. citizens.
Roy Beck, the executive director of Numbers USA, a nonprofit that supports lower immigration levels, has suggested in the past that farmers might become more innovative if they did not depend on the labor of illegal immigrants. They might even resort to using more mechanization in harvesting, he said.
By Jeremy Redmon -- The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Roy Beck of the reform group NumbersUSA sees it as much more than that, calling the ruling "a tremendous victory for unemployed Americans."
"There are about 7 million illegal aliens estimated to be working in non-agricultural jobs. There are many Americans unemployed and lined up to get those jobs," Beck claimed.
Also supporting the ruling is the Latino advocacy group known as the League of United Latin American citizens (LULAC).
Luis Vera, LULAC's general counsel, says the law should expose businesses that utilize underpaid immigrants in unsafe conditions.
About a dozen states have laws similar to Arizona's.
"There are at least a dozen other states that have held back," Rob Beck said, "I think we're going to see those states passing those laws in the next year."
by Barry Bagnato -- CBS News
Roy Beck of the reform group NumbersUSA sees it as much more than that, calling the ruling "a tremendous victory for unemployed Americans."
"There are about 7 million illegal aliens estimated to be working in non-agricultural jobs. There are many Americans unemployed and lined up to get those jobs," Beck claimed.
Also supporting the ruling is the Latino advocacy group known as the League of United Latin American citizens (LULAC).
Luis Vera, LULAC's general counsel, says the law should expose businesses that utilize underpaid immigrants in unsafe conditions.
About a dozen states have laws similar to Arizona's.
"There are at least a dozen other states that have held back," Rob Beck said, "I think we're going to see those states passing those laws in the next year."
Further, he predicts the business community's concerned for a single uniform system will send it from the Supreme Court across the street to Congress, to push for a standard nationwide eVerify requirement.
“Rock guitarist Carlos Santana may have reached a new low in hate speech against American workers,” wrote Roy Beck, head of NumbersUSA, which favors strict immigration policies, “when he took to a microphone on the field before the Atlanta Braves-Philadelphia Phillies game yesterday. . .Santana, like most pro-illegal-immigration activists, doesn't have the slightest idea about the reality of American workers.”
Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, which advocates for lower levels of legal and illegal immigration, said a lawsuit would come if the state tries to move forward with the proposal.
"This is about running their own immigration system," Beck said. "It's not going anywhere."
Outside the Legislature, an initiative campaign is taking place to put an Arizona-like measure on the 2012 ballot for California.
These strategies are intended to “mainly do what Arizona has succeeded in doing, which is making their state inhospitable for illegal aliens and making them move out voluntarily,” said Roy Beck, executive director of Numbers USA, which advocates more limited immigration.
Experts said there is no evidence that these regulations have created more jobs or improved the economy in Arizona.
NumbersUSA.com, which advocates for lower immigration levels, “estimates 6 million jobs in America are held by illegal aliens. If Congress passed mandatory E-Verify it would open up 2.76 million jobs for Americans,” Walsh said.
"In the current economic climate, the half-million amnestied illegal young adults would compete for scarce jobs," said Roy Beck, executive director of the Numbers USA organisation which favours reduced immigration
The Minnesota House has passed legislation aimed at ensuring all cities enforce immigration laws.
Under the bill, local government officials can no longer restrict employees from sharing immigration data with federal authorities. It also preempts local ordinances that prohibit cooperation in immigration enforcement. Supporters say the bill would help enforce immigration laws. The legislation passed with House with a vote of 77-52.
Tens of thousands of Alabama businesses have missed a deadline set by the state's strict immigration law to register with a federal database used to verify the citizenship status of job applicants, according to registration numbers.
Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant says he's disappointed an immigration-enforcement bill died Tuesday when a Senate committee chairman chose not to bring it up for a vote.
Mississippi lawmakers moved closer to enacting legislation to crack down on undocumented immigrants in the state, though the proposal does not go as far as neighboring Alabama's law, widely seen as the toughest in the nation and now the focus of a court challenger by the Obama administration.
Continuing a 93-year fight to control immigration, American Legion leaders are
rallying military veterans to convince California
voters they should require police to enforce federal immigration law.
"This country is for people who are here legally, who are
born here, not for people who came here illegally, who kind of snuck in,"
said Bill Siler, adjutant of California's
American Legion branch.
A shortage of workers in the field caused $10 million in crop losses for 500 Georgia farmers who responded to a study called for by Georgia's new immigration law.
Alabama’s unemployment rate fell at a record pace in November amid stepped-up efforts by President Barack Obama’s deputies to frustrate enforcement of the state’s popular new immigration reform.
The state’s unemployment rate fell 0.6 percent in November to 8.7 percent, according to new state reports, partly because the state’s employers opened up jobs to Americans after shedding illegal immigrants.
The unemployment rate is far below October’s rate of 9.3 percent and September’s rate of 9.8 percent.
Until recently, Maryland’s legal and political battle over in-state tuition has been seen as pitting young illegal immigrants against native residents. But in the past few months, a petition drive by opponents of the measure has attracted a small but growing number of legal immigrants, who say that they, too, are being cheated.
Springfield City Council discussed the ballot language associated with the E-verify ordinance at its Monday night meeting. Council also discussed when to put the issue to voters: either February 7 or March 6, 2012. Earlier this year, the Ozarks Minutemen submitted enough signatures to force a public vote.
San Bernardino County has implemented a policy
to require all contractors that do business with the County to use
the federal government’s E-Verify system to ensure that their
employees are legally authorized to work in the United States.
Comments
Although comments are moderated, they do not necessarily reflect the views of NumbersUSA or its staff.