Roy Beck's picture


  by  Roy Beck

For the eighth year, NumbersUSA's top staff is working our big booth at the world's largest Earth Day exhibition at the Texas State Fairgrounds in Dallas.

While hundreds of environmental groups, corporations, educational institutions and research facilities tell their stories, NumbersUSA reminds attendees about the main reason why the sustainability goals of the first Earth Day in 1970 still haven't been met -- massive population growth forced by congressional immigration policies.

EarthDay1Because this event take place in the Texas Urban Triangle, our exhibit focuses on the rapid loss of farmland and habitat near the Texas cities that define this triangle: Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio-Austin.

Our staff will be talking to the crowds throughout the three-day weekend event. We entice lots of people up and close and personal with our giant gumball machine. People guess the number inside the big globe with the hint that they represent number of acres of farmland and natural habitat being lost over a short period of time.

EarthDay1And, of course, we talk about the history of our national population size on this 49th Earth Day when U.S. population has surpassed 327 million . . . with no upper limit in sight.

This was definitely not the environmental dream at the first Earth Day in 1970 when teach-ins across the nation stressed that the nation was unable to responsibly handle even the 200-million population at that time.

EarthDay1The Father of Earth Day, Sen. Gaylord Nelson, expressed the dominant hope that U.S. population would never exceed 250 million.

And that hopeful vision likely would have come true if Congress had not insisted on greatly increasing the annual flow of immigration.


Like other Earth Day Dreamers in the 1960s and 1970s, Sen. Nelson (D-Wis.) was clear that the United States could never meet its environmental goals without stabilizing its population. (A presidential commission in 1973 and another one in the 1990s came to the same conclusion.)


If Congress had left annual immigration at around 300,000, the conservation laws that Sen. Nelson helped pass in the first Earth Day period likely would have resulted in the nation meeting most of those 1970-era environmental goals by now, aided in large part by a population that would be leveling off at around 250 million.

Instead, the country is struggling to slow the environmental degradation that comes from having to provide the housing, roads, workplaces, food, and waste disposal not just for the 250 million but for nearly 80 million residents above that. NumbersUSA's many sprawl studies have calculated the millions of acres of farmland and natural habitat destroyed to handle the extra population forced by one Congress after another.


Our nationwide ad campaign portrays the numbers behind this environmental tragedy in 30 seconds. It notes that annual immigration in the 1950s was around 250,000 but was double that in the 1980s and now is more than one million a year.

The ad ends by pointing out that polls find most Americans wanting immigration cut by a lot but that Congress shows no sign of listening, content in its apparent ignorance or indifference to the environmental consequences.


I conveyed my sadness about the betrayal of the Earth Day Dreamers in the Introduction for "Re-Charting America's Future," the book I wrote for high school debate teams whose national topic in the 1994-95 year was immigration:

But Congress all the while has been flooding the nation with unprecedented waves of foreign workers and their relatives. U.S population growth has surged.

Now . . . Americans are faced with a heartbreaking conclusion: Washington has canceled out much of the environmental and social benefits that their choice of small families could have provided.

In effect, Congress has re-charted the future that Americans thought they were creating.

Since 1972, American women have averaged about two children each, a rate that produces no long-term population expansion. But Congress has used immigration to drive population growth higher than it was during the Baby Boom.

NumbersUSA is a single-issue organization that works on the stabilization issue only in terms of whether immigration policy allows or prevents stabilization from happening.

To see which Members of today's Congress have worked hardest to force that population expansion and resulting environmental damage, check out the Members with "F" and "D" grades on our Immigration-Reduction Grade Cards.

ROY BECK is Founder & President of NumbersUSA


Updated: Mon, May 7th 2018 @ 12:55pm EDT

NumbersUSA's blogs are copyrighted and may be republished or reposted only if they are copied in their entirety, including this paragraph, and provide proper credit to NumbersUSA. NumbersUSA bears no responsibility for where our blogs may be republished or reposted. The views expressed in blogs do not necessarily reflect the official position of NumbersUSA.