EDITOR'S NOTE: With Covid-19 dominating the news and the minds of many of us, NumbersUSA Scientific Director Leon Kolankiewicz has provided a broad personal overview of key global trends that he believes make pandemics a likely occurrence. Not much of this relates directly to immigration policies, which are the focus of NumbersUSA; although immigration policies in every country have always been partly about keeping out dangerous diseases, immigration plays only a small role in pandemics like the one that is beginning to paralyze the United States. Yet, there are serious overlapping forces behind pandemics and mass immigration. Leon notes: "The current pandemic is perhaps the inevitable outcome of an unprepared, globalized, borderless, overpopulated world." And the importance of borders is clear: "In addition to all the obvious medical measures, more than ever the world needs borders, population stabilization, and more ethical approaches to our non-human neighbors on this ever smaller planet." Before assuming his position with NumbersUSA last fall, Leon had spent decades as an environmental scientist throughout the United States, British Columbia, Central America and beyond. Here is his viewpoint.
“Feels like déjà vu all over again.”
It seems like just yesterday that I was warning about the threat of viral pandemics on an overpopulated, interconnected planet.
In fact the year was 2014, at the time of the last horrific outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus in Africa, which went on to kill thousands. The first ever case of this lethal disease had just been diagnosed in the United States.
Back then, I wrote words that could almost have been penned again just yesterday:
It was perhaps inevitable that this terrifying scourge should arrive on our own shores, given its exponential growth in West Africa, its long incubation period, the ease of international air travel, and the sheer number of both returning Americans and foreigners (tens of millions of travelers and migrants annually) entering the United States from abroad.
Just substitute “China” for “West Africa.”
Even earlier than that, back in 2009, I warned in a radio interview during the Swine Flu epidemic that:
If they could speak, what would germs call millions of weakened, malnourished people living in overcrowded conditions? A feast.
Understandably, no one listened to me, an obscure environmental scientist and blogger. But you would think they’d have paid more attention to the prestigious and well-connected Rand Institution in 2012 when it warned that pandemics were “capable of destroying America’s way of life.”
Or maybe U.S. authorities would have and should have been more inclined to lend an ear to Microsoft founder and mega-philanthropist Bill Gates, richest man in the world for much of the past two decades, when he warned in a 2005 TED talk that the greatest risk of a global catastrophe was “not missiles, but microbes.”
Gates re-issued his warning in another 2015 TED talk called “The next outbreak? We’re not ready,” now viewed by more than 18 million on YouTube.
The first lesson of the 2020 coronavirus/COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic for Americans and most other nationalities is how little heeded warnings of such predictable catastrophes are – even when amplified by reputable, prestigious sources with large public platforms and considerable megaphones.
Most ordinary folks are just too caught up in life’s day-to-day travails and pleasures, and most public officials too busy in putting out fires. Thus, neither heeds dire warnings of some sweeping disaster that might (or might not) happen over the next decade (even though it’s inevitable over the next several decades or century) or to invest adequately in preparedness for the future. They (we) all ignore the Boy Scouts’ motto to “be prepared,” and they (we) do so at our common peril.
The second lesson is that we are in part a victim of our own technological and scientific hubris In the 1950s, dazzled by the stunning advances of antibiotics and vaccines in conquering humanity’s ancient microbial enemies, some in the medical profession had the audacity – now perceived in hindsight as incredibly naïve – to prophesize the imminent elimination of all infectious diseases from the world.
This led to a certain complacency on the part of society, when all along scientists knew that, 1) nature abhors a vacuum; 2) nature is dynamic, not static or stagnant, and 3) organisms evolve. The moment we began throwing antibiotics at microbial bugs was the very moment they began evolving resistance to them. Feeding antibiotics to increase the growth (and profitability) of livestock destined for our dinner tables was not an optimal long-term strategy to manage and integrate food production and public health.
Third, zoonotic diseases – those caused by viruses, bacteria, or parasites that can spread from non-human animals or wildlife to human beings – are a major threat to Homo sapiens. Some 75% of emerging infectious diseases we face are believed to come from animals. These include the coronavirus at the center of the current pandemic.
This is an incredible irony, because the big picture is that humans and our domesticated livestock (e.g., cattle, pigs, sheep, chickens) are literally taking over the planet.
As shown in the diagram below from the UK group Population Matters, based on the research of University of Manitoba ecologist Vaclav Smil, some 10,000 years ago, just before the advent of agriculture, if one added up the weight of all the land vertebrates then living on Earth, the combined population of human beings comprised about 1% of that total weight, or biomass.
Back then, prior to the Agricultural Revolution, there were no livestock.
Nowadays, in stark contrast, humans comprise some 32% of the total terrestrial biomass, and our livestock another 67%, for a total of 99%. In essence, we have replaced all but 1% of all wild birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles with ourselves and the domestic animals that we maintain to feed us.
Updated: Thu, Sep 10th 2020 @ 2:55pm EDT