Hot Topics
- Birthright Citizenship
- Chain Migration
- CLEAR Act
- Comprehensive Amnesty Threat
- November 16, 2009 EST - posted on NumbersUSA
Anti-Amnesty Tea Party Movement Begins to Spread Across Country - October 19, 2009 EST - posted on NumbersUSA
More Evangelical Denominations Distance from NAE Pro-Amnesty Lobbying - October 15, 2009 EST - posted on NumbersUSA
Salvation Army Does NOT Support Evangelical Group's Pro-Amnesty Lobbying - October 14, 2009 EST - posted on NumbersUSA
Zogby Survey Reveals that Amnesty Would Increase Illegal Immigration from Mexico - E-Verify
- Foreign Worker Timeout
- Health Care Reform
- The SAVE Act
- The Visa Lottery
- More Topics
- Recent Blogs


Digg
Newsvine
Facebook
MySpace
Twitter
Albert3441 of PA
Sun, 06/28/2009 - 4:51pm
Re: 693,437 Anti-Amnesty, LESS-Immigration Faxes So Far This Mon
“The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” This proverb should be emblazoned over the main entrance of both houses of congress. Our lawmakers often try to impress the public with their high ideals (so called), but what they need to do first and foremost is to assess the actual effect on their constituents that the codification of these “ideals” into law will have.
It is the consequences of public policy decisions that count in the long run, not the intent. Take the example of the 18th amendment to the US constitution. It was intended to cure the evils of drunkenness. What it actually did was to create a vast criminal empire that bedevils us to this very day; the effects on drunkenness were minimal.
Congressional duplicity on the jobs issue is just another example of how our “leaders” point to their intentions (compassion for the “undocumented”) as means of escaping responsibility for the effects of their actions (more unemployment for Americans). They publicly declare their good intention, and then use it a shield to deflect criticism.
But, if the likely consequences of a proposed public policy are bad, then it is a bad public policy, notwithstanding its good intentions. The American public needs to make its lawmakers understand that being an idealist is not enough; each lawmaker must be a consequentialist.
Thanks, Roy, for encouraging Americans to take the consequentialist view. Now if only we could persuade congress…