Home > Hot Topics > More Topics > Chain Migration > Immigrant Poverty Rate Increases Significantly

Chain Migration

Overview

Chain Migration refers to the endless and often-snowballing chains of foreign
nationals who are allowed to immigrate because the law allows citizens and lawful permanent residents to bring in their extended, non-nuclear family members.

Chain migration is the primary mechanism that has caused legal immigration in this country to quadruple from about 250,000 per year in the 1950s and 1960s to more than one million a year since 1990. As such, it is one of the chief culprits in America's current record-breaking population boom and all the attendant sprawl, congestion, school overcrowding, and other impacts that reduce American's quality of life.

Chain Migration refers to the endless and often-snowballing chains of foreign
nationals who are allowed to immigrate because the law allows citizens and lawful permanent residents to bring in their extended, non-nuclear family members.

Chain migration is the primary mechanism that has caused legal immigration in this country to quadruple from about 250,000 per year in the 1950s and 1960s to more than one million a year since 1990. As such, it is one of the chief culprits in America's current record-breaking population boom and all the attendant sprawl, congestion, school overcrowding, and other impacts that reduce American's quality of life.

Chain migration is about family reunification beyond the nuclear family. Until the late 1950s, America's immigration tradition of family unity had only included spouses and minor children. But since then, immigrants can also send for their siblings, parents and adult children. These non-nuclear family members actually get precedence over an immigrant’s nuclear family. This ill-conceived system also creates incentives for illegal immigration because adult relatives of legal residents are known to overstay their
visas (becoming illegal aliens) in hopes of becoming legal immigrants. Moreover, since hundreds of millions of people in the world have a relative in the U.S., the migration chain can eventually reach them all.

The claim that chain migration is about “family reunification” ignores the fact that each immigrant who comes to the U.S. “disunites” another family by leaving some new relatives behind. If a person really wants to live near his/her extended family, he/she should remain in the country where that extended family lives. Except for the very small percentage of each year's newcomers who are refugees, nobody is forcing immigrants to leave their families.

On February 8, 2007 Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) introduced H.R. 938, The Nuclear Family Priority Act, which would :

  • Eliminate chain migration;
  • Expedite reunification of nuclear families (i.e., married couples and parents with their young children); and
  • Relieve the workload that overwhelms the immigration system and undermines homeland security.

Currently, 22 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives co-sponsor this critical bill. The list is growing every day.

If enacted, the Nuclear Family Priority Act would implement one of the key recommendations of former Rep. Barbara Jordan (D-Texas), the chair of the bi-partisan U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform. The Jordan Commission found that America’s national interests would best be served by eliminating extended family-based immigration categories, and it urged that nuclear family members become the sole family-based priority. To fight economic injustice, the Commission urged a reduction in immigration numbers that are now so high as to harm the most vulnerable American workers and their families.

Show More

Visit your Action Buffet to take action!

Update

Immigrant Poverty Rate Increases Significantly

The Census Bureau’s latest “economic report card” indicates that while there was a slight increase in the overall poverty rate between 2006 and 2007 -- from 12.3 percent to 12.5 percent -- the poverty rate for immigrants in particular jumped from 15.2 percent to 16.5 percent. In response to the Bureau’s economic analysis, Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson suggests that the current high rate of immigration by unskilled workers is responsible for swelling the numbers of those who live in poverty, as well as for dragging down median income and increasing the ranks of those without health insurance.

From 2006 to 2007, poverty rates for whites, blacks and Asians were flat, with whites at 8.2 percent, African Americans at 24.5 percent and Asians at 10.2 percent. The Hispanics poverty rate, however, rose from 20.6 percent to 21.5 percent. The number of Americans living under the poverty line reached 37.3 million in 2007, up 800,000 from the previous year. The number of children living in poverty increased by 500,000.

While the inflation-adjusted national median income increased by 1.3 percent between 2006 and 2007, African American households and Latino households continued to have lower median incomes than White or Asian households. At $33,916, blacks had the lowest median income in 2007, compared to $38,679 for Latinos, $54,920 for whites, and $66,103 for Asians.

The number of uninsured Americans actually fell from 47 million in 2006 to 45.7 million in 2007, but this was due to the fact that more people were covered under federal and state programs such as Medicare. Rising health care spending continued to erode take home pay, however.

Samuelson believes that any analysis of our economic well-being -- as viewed through median income, the poverty rate and health insurance coverage -- must take into account how immigration distorts commonly cited statistics. He writes:

Low-skilled immigrants, concentrated among Hispanics, outnumber the high-skilled. They drag down median incomes and raise poverty and the number of uninsured. One way to filter out the effect on income is to examine groups with few immigrants or their American-born children. Consider non-Hispanic white families. From 1997 to 2007, their median incomes rose about $6,000, to $69,937, a gain of about 9 percent. For black families, the increase was also about 9 percent, though only to $40,222. Again, not stagnation.

Immigration's effects on poverty and health insurance coverage are greater. Since 1990, Hispanics numerically account for all the increase in the number of officially poor. Similarly, immigrants represented 55 percent of the increase of the uninsured from 1994 to 2006, says the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Many unskilled workers can't get well-paid jobs with insurance…

…(I)f the immigration of low-skilled workers continues unabated -- whether they're legal or illegal -- the ranks of the poor will swell, as will the uninsured or the costs of providing government insurance.

It is important to remember that immigration levels can be reduced by Congress if pressure is brought to bear by the American people. The way to accomplish this is to limit family-based immigration to immediate family members and to pass the SAVE Act, which will turn off the jobs magnet that attracts illegal aliens. This is much needed, particularly during an economic downturn.

Click here to see more information on the current workforce situation.

Legislative Analysis

Fact Sheet on "Visa Recapture"

Legislative Analysis - Friday, September 5, 2008

Fact sheet on the legislative ploy to "recapture" unused visas.

Fact sheet on the legislative ploy to "recapture" unused visas.

Show More Download Publication

Publications

Categories of Migrants Recognized Under US Law

Publications - Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Two Sides of the Same Coin: The Connection Between Legal and Illegal Immigration

Articles - Wednesday, February 1, 2006

Are massive legal immigration and massive illegal immigration related? If so, how?

by James R. Edwards, Jr., February, 2006

Are massive legal immigration and massive illegal immigration related? If so, how? Many in policy circles hold a view of "Legal immigration, good; illegal immigration, bad." The logical extensions of such a simplistic perspective are to assume that the overall level of legal immigration does not matter and to underestimate any correlation to illegal immigration. But the facts show a distinct connection exists... Many aliens who receive a permanent resident visa each year have spent years living in the United States illegally... "Anchor babies" and "chain migration" provide opportunities for many aliens to plant roots in the United States. Those aliens might not otherwise have done so.

by James R. Edwards, Jr., February, 2006

Show More http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back106.html

Articles

Two Sides of the Same Coin: The Connection Between Legal and Illegal Immigration

Articles - Wednesday, February 1, 2006

Are massive legal immigration and massive illegal immigration related? If so, how?

by James R. Edwards, Jr., February, 2006

Are massive legal immigration and massive illegal immigration related? If so, how? Many in policy circles hold a view of "Legal immigration, good; illegal immigration, bad." The logical extensions of such a simplistic perspective are to assume that the overall level of legal immigration does not matter and to underestimate any correlation to illegal immigration. But the facts show a distinct connection exists... Many aliens who receive a permanent resident visa each year have spent years living in the United States illegally... "Anchor babies" and "chain migration" provide opportunities for many aliens to plant roots in the United States. Those aliens might not otherwise have done so.

by James R. Edwards, Jr., February, 2006

Show More http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back106.html

Stats

Chain Migration Under Current U.S. Law

Stats - Thursday, May 8, 2008

chain migration table

chain migration table

Numbers SA Education and Research Foundation February 14, 2007

Download Publication