
The SAVE Act is the middle-ground answer to the illegal immigration issue. This not only will be the most effective solution, but it is what polls show most Americans want. When given the choice among (a) mass roundups and mass deportations, (b) mass legalizations, and (c) Attrition Through Enforcement & Self Deportation, the public chooses the middle-ground Attrition option.
The bi-partisan SAVE Act was introduced by Rep. Heath Shuler (D-N.C.) in the House and Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) in the Senate. It is one of our "5 Great Immigration Reduction Bills".
The SAVE Act is a three-pronged approach to reducing illegal immigration in the United States:
The SAVE Act is the middle-ground answer to the illegal immigration issue. This not only will be the most effective solution, but it is what polls show most Americans want. When given the choice among (a) mass roundups and mass deportations, (b) mass legalizations, and (c) Attrition Through Enforcement & Self Deportation, the public chooses the middle-ground Attrition option.
The bi-partisan SAVE Act was introduced by Rep. Heath Shuler (D-N.C.) in the House and Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) in the Senate. It is one of our "5 Great Immigration Reduction Bills".
The SAVE Act is a three-pronged approach to reducing illegal immigration in the United States:
In July 2010, a federal judge in Arizona blocked several provisions of Arizona's new immigration enforcement law. The main provision that was blocked would have required police officers to check the immigration status of individuals they have stopped, detained, or arrested if they have reasonable suspicion that they are in the country illegally. The SAVE Act would drastically reduce the number of illegal aliens living in the United States, thereby reducing the impact of the federal judge's decision.
Monday, December 1, 2008, 2:24 PM EST - posted on NumbersUSA

Elected Officials Who...
Representative Heath Shuler (D-NC) plans to reintroduce The SAVE Act during the new session. The bill had 157 cosponsors, but the House leadership prevented a vote as Congress turned its attention to rising gas prices and the economy.
The bill would require all employers to use the Department of Homeland Security’s E-Verify system that checks to see whether or not an applicant can legally work in the United States. The bill would also strengthen border security and both points are issues the majority of Democrats oppose.
"The Democratic (congressional) leadership didn't want it," said Steven Camarota, research director at the Center for Immigration Studies, in an article in the Ashville Citizen-Times
"We're going to continue with the process," Shuler told the paper. "The issue still needs to be raised."
Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said that the Senate would work with the Obama Administration on passing a comprehensive immigration reform package. The package would likely slow down the rate of workplace raids and find alternative solutions to deportations.
The Ashville Citizen-Times has more on this story.
Stats - Friday, April 18, 2008
Fact Sheets - Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Fact Sheets - Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Letters & Endorsements - Thursday, July 23, 2009
Letters & Endorsements - Thursday, July 23, 2009
Oppose Amnesty Support Tougher Enforcement Oppose Rewards for Illegal Migration Opinion Elites vs. Public - Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Quoted - Friday, August 10, 2007
Quoted - Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Quoted - Monday, April 16, 2007
In the News - Thursday, May 14, 2009
In the News - Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Comments
Although comments are moderated, they do not necessarily reflect the views of NumbersUSA or its staff.